| » Stats |
Members: 95,794
Threads: 38,305
Posts: 365,015
Top Poster: Karky (10,106) | | Welcome to our newest member, yoyoyoshi777 | | » Fitness.com Fitness Shop | | |
If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
 | | 
Apr. 27/08, 09:09 PM
|  | Sianara | | Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,749
| | | Low Carb vs Low Fat | 
Apr. 28/08, 07:01 AM
|  | Bond Boy | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,953
| | | Conclusions: Compared with a low-fat diet, a low-carbohydrate diet program had better participant retention and greater weight loss. During active weight loss, serum triglyceride levels decreased more and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level increased more with the low-carbohydrate diet than with the low-fat diet. | 
Apr. 28/08, 07:23 AM
|  | Second Set | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 454
| | | A good study, though the limitations may have had a strong influence on the results:
Limitations: We could not definitively distinguish effects of the low-carbohydrate diet and those of the nutritional supplements provided only to that group. In addition, participants were healthy and were followed for only 24 weeks. These factors limit the generalizability of the study results.
I'm also not a fan of including in the conclusion (specifically completion rates as a result of diet) when there are far too many unnoted factors (wish I could see the whole thing), such as adherance to diet and exercise and full disclosure of dietary regiments. I also believe that post intervention psychological analysis of motivation (through interview or survey) is absolutely necessary (though rarely done) in studies such as this, as it something that could have a rather large impact on adherance and success.
In the end, fat loss in both groups is significant, which of course leads us back to the overall "healthiness" of the two different approaches, for which the jury is still out on. | 
Apr. 28/08, 08:40 AM
| | Third Set | | Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 659
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by study article Adverse Effects
Several symptomatic adverse effects occurred more frequently in the low-carbohydrate diet group than in the low-fat diet group, including constipation (68% vs. 35%; P < 0.001), headache (60% vs. 40%; P = 0.03), halitosis (38% vs. 8%; P < 0.001), muscle cramps (35% vs. 7%; P < 0.001), diarrhea (23% vs. 7%; P = 0.02), general weakness (25% vs. 8%; P = 0.01), and rash (13% vs. 0%; P = 0.006). | Hmmm, constipation would seem to indicate lack of fiber / vegetables. Don't all diet ideologies advocate higher consumption of low calorie (= low carb and low fat) vegetables? Quote: |
Originally Posted by study article Diet Composition
Diet composition was measured on the basis of food records collected at each visit from a subsample of participants (13 from the low-carbohydrate diet group and 7 from the low-fat diet group.) The low-carbohydrate diet group consumed a mean (±SD) of 29.5 ± 11.1 g of carbohydrates (8% of daily energy intake), 97.9 ± 24.3 g of protein (26% of daily energy intake), and 110.6 ± 27.3 g of fat (68% of daily energy intake) daily. The low-fat diet group consumed 197.6 ± 34.2 g of carbohydrates (52% of daily energy intake), 70.5 ± 9.7 g of protein (19% of daily energy intake), and 48.9 ± 12.0 g of fat (29% of daily energy intake) daily. The estimated daily energy intake was 6.14 ± 1.37 MJ (1461.0 ± 325.7 kcal) in the low-carbohydrate diet group and 6.31 ± 0.68 MJ (1502.0 ± 162.1 kcal) in the low-fat diet group. | "Low fat" in this case would seem to be the orthodox <= 30% of calories from fat with overall calorie restriction, not the super low fat approaches that some advocate. Both diet groups in the study took in about the same calories total, but with more variation among the low carbohydrate group. | 
Apr. 28/08, 08:48 AM
|  | International Man of Mystery | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Greater Cincinnati
Posts: 2,507
| | | I can't fathom how you could get enough fiber with a low carb diet. Most of your fiber comes in higher carb foods | 
Apr. 28/08, 10:53 AM
| | Third Set | | Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 659
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by theGOOCH I can't fathom how you could get enough fiber with a low carb diet. Most of your fiber comes in higher carb foods |
But, given many people's dislike for vegetables, it is certainly possible that the dieters in this study did not eat enough of them. | 
Apr. 28/08, 03:43 PM
|  | Bond Boy | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,953
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by theGOOCH I can't fathom how you could get enough fiber with a low carb diet. Most of your fiber comes in higher carb foods | Flax seed + veggies. | 
Apr. 28/08, 05:29 PM
|  | Level I Burpee Performer | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: wherever the wind takes me...
Posts: 548
| | | I did a report on the atkins diet, and was actually fortunate enough to get a brief phone interview with a researcher at my university who did one of the premier low fat vs low carb diet studies. I don't have the study with me, but he found that over six months people on low carb diets lost more weight and had lower LDL cholesterol and higher HDL cholesterol than those on a low fat diet. However, after a year he found that these differences no longer existed. The study was done by simply giving one group the Atkins diet book and the other a conventional low fat diet book and telling them to follow it. They also received some intensive training at the start on how to do the diet, and then bi weekly checkups. | 
Apr. 28/08, 07:04 PM
|  | Second Set | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 454
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by amp89 However, after a year he found that these differences no longer existed. | That seems to be the general consensus in longitudinal studies and meta-analysis. Which means that once again, it falls back on the general impact on health of the two different diets. | 
Apr. 28/08, 07:30 PM
|  | International Man of Mystery | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Greater Cincinnati
Posts: 2,507
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by tjl
But, given many people's dislike for vegetables, it is certainly possible that the dieters in this study did not eat enough of them. | If you only eat 2000 calories you should get about 30 grams of fiber
Is that lettuce? It would take 40 cups of lettuce to get 30 grams of fiber ..or 38 cups of spinach
or 12 cups of broccoli
or 12 cups of cauliflower
or 73 large spears of asparagus
I doubt anyone eating 2000 calories eats those kinds of numbers. What low carb vegetables are higher in fiber?
For me, the highest fiber items I can find are whole grains, sweet potatoes, beans...all high carb | 
Apr. 29/08, 03:12 PM
|  | Bond Boy | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,953
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by theGOOCH If you only eat 2000 calories you should get about 30 grams of fiber
Is that lettuce? It would take 40 cups of lettuce to get 30 grams of fiber ..or 38 cups of spinach
or 12 cups of broccoli
or 12 cups of cauliflower
or 73 large spears of asparagus
I doubt anyone eating 2000 calories eats those kinds of numbers. What low carb vegetables are higher in fiber?
For me, the highest fiber items I can find are whole grains, sweet potatoes, beans...all high carb | I know for one thing, when people go on restricted low carb diets such as the Anabolic diet, they don't eat any whole grains or breads but use those 30grams of carbs very carefully and only eat brocolli and other veggies.
Veggies + flax seed = enough fiber. | 
Apr. 29/08, 06:19 PM
|  | Epic Adventurer | | Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,869
| | | I have read some things that suggest fiber isn't even good for you.
On a keto diet the foods you eat are very low waste foods.
But yeah, just eat some flax seed and some veggies and you get enough fiber. | 
May. 02/08, 03:59 PM
|  | Second Set | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 434
| | | my digestive system is a lot happier with me when I eat fiber | 
May. 02/08, 06:30 PM
|  | International Man of Mystery | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Greater Cincinnati
Posts: 2,507
| | It takes 1 1/4 cups of flax seed to make 30 grams of fiber, eat up!
I got 97 grams of fiber today LOL I'm definitely not low carb though | 
May. 02/08, 07:17 PM
|  | Sianara | | Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,749
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by theGOOCH It takes 1 1/4 cups of flax seed to make 30 grams of fiber, eat up!
I got 97 grams of fiber today LOL I'm definitely not low carb though | Ya I can easily reach 60g per day, and used to be at 90+. Its all about double fiber bread and Mission Wraps. |  | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Other threads in forum Articles and Research | | Thread | Date | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post | Grounding Meditation....
Grounding Meditation....: Grounding Meditation :
...
| Apr. 05/09 | meditationmusic | 0 | Apr. 05/09 11:35 PM | WorldFitness - Weekly Update
WorldFitness - Weekly Update: World Fitness.com Community Bulletin
For...
| Oct. 24/06 | AllCdnBoy | 0 | Oct. 24/06 08:30 AM | needing advice to start!
needing advice to start!: Hi all, well I am new here, 33 years old, 5'4"...
| Jun. 30/05 | mistyvine | 4 | Jul. 01/05 06:57 PM | New Year’s Resolution: Love Your Body!
New Year’s Resolution: Love Your Body!: Ah, the beginning of a New Year. A time to...
| Jan. 19/04 | chris | 0 | Jan. 19/04 04:46 PM | | » Online Users: 150 | | 2 members and 148 guests | | evolution, yoyoyoshi777 | | Most users ever online was 1,736, Apr. 17/07 at 06:27 PM. | |