If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
I have a question regarding something that's been bugging me about exercising. Running vs. Bicycling. First off, I want to say that I do not enjoy running as a form of exercise. Basically because after about 2 days that I run for consecutively(about 30 mins each day), my shins start to hurt I think it is because of my excess weight, but that is my opinion. Now, I feel like running is THE ONLY form of cardio that pays off. I say that because after running, you feel tired, out of breath, and feel like you just completed a really hard workout. Now, about bicycling, I love it. I cold do it for a looong time. But my problem is, why does bicycling seem like a not such vigorous activity? I mean, when I do bicycle, its not leisure its a good enough pace to get me to start breathing hard, but After I finish bicycling, why does it seem like I haven't done as hard of a workout than running? Also, I found out, that you can burn almost the same amount of calories as running, which I find interesting. So my final question is, will bicycling be a good form of cardio for me while trying to lose weight?
Come ride with my pack on a Saturday 50-mile ride! We rarely dip below 20mph except at stop signs and lights and heavy traffic and average 19+ mph for the full 52 miles. My heart rate never drops below 135 and hits highs in the mid 150s, which for me is a very good heart rate for exercise. I do this for about 2.5 hours.
By the way, I am the junior in the pack at 48 and our pack includes a 49yo, 51yo and a very fast 68yo.
For three hours of elevated heart rate from running, you would have to run 15+ miles, depending on your speed and conditioning.